Comments, News, Essays, Articles
Thursday, 31 March 2005
Terri Schiavo: Thorny problems of consciousness and sentience
The extraordinary media frenzy and obscene intrusion into what
should have been a private family tragedy barely touched on the core
dilemma highlighted by the Terri Schiavo case. Pundits of all shades
opined at length on legal and ethical issues surrounding
euthanasia/religion, church/state, executive/judiciary and
spouse/family relationships. But there has been little discussion
about the growing quandary faced by medical science: How can we
determine with certainty the presence or absence of consciousness and
sentience in a living being? This thorny issue is also at the heart of
the abortion debate.
As every inhabitant of planet Earth with access to the media now knows,
Theresa Marie Schiavo sustained irreversible damage to her cerebral
cortex (upper brain) occasioned by loss of oxygen following a heart
attack in February 1990. The injury left her in a coma for two and a
half months after which she entered a peculiar condition of
'wakefulness without awareness' that personal physicians and several
court-appointed experts subsequently diagnosed as a persistent
vegetative state (PVS).
The US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
describes PVS as a condition in which
"the individual loses the higher
cerebral powers of the brain, but the functions of the brainstem, such
as respiration (breathing) and circulation, remain relatively intact.
Spontaneous movements may occur and the eyes may open in response to
external stimuli, but the patient does not speak or obey commands.
Patients in a vegetative state may appear somewhat normal. They may
occasionally grimace, cry, or laugh."
In short, PVS is a state of
partial consciousness with total loss of the thought process due to a
damaged braincortex while a person still retains reflex motorised
functions via a healthy brainstem. The term 'PVS' was coined in 1972 by
Scottish neurosurgeon Bryan Jennett and American neurologist Fred Plum
to describe this new peculiar part-conscious state made possible by the
increasing capacity of medical technology to keep a patient's
metabolism going long after conscious action has ceased.
The problem is that diagnosis of PVS is necessarily subjective based on
inferences drawn by medical practitioners from the brain's physical
condition, EEG wave patterns, CT scans etc. and a series of prescribed
patient-response tests. No one can say
with absolute certainty that a
living, conscious person is, or is not, thinking or experiencing
sentience. Thus, unlike 'whole brain death', PVS is not recognised as a
legal definition of death although few people have been reported to
recover. Even these rare cases are in dispute -- some experts hold
that PVS is irreversible and as such the patients that recovered must
have been misdiagnosed in the first place.
Not surprisingly PVS
controversies have spawned several bitter legal disputes over the true
condition of patients, the most litigious being the very public
challenge
mounted by the Schindlers (Terri Schiavo's parents). But
there have been other prominent cases, e.g.
Paul Brophy and
Martha Sharp (Sunny) von Bülow.
These cases give an indication of the massive problems that lie ahead.
I wrote in
Why We Exist
(The Nature of Death, pg 110) that "as advances
in neuroscience and cybernetics combine to give us the ability to
manipulate, sustain and even replace brain tissue, the debate has
shifted yet again to just how much of the brain must be lost
irretrievably before a patient can be declared dead ...
[neo-corticalists] outlined an argument that human beings should be
declared dead once they enter an irreversible state of inability to
interact meaningfully with others ... However even this latter
definition
is being rendered unclear daily by improvements in techniques for
reversing brain injuries."
The whole of society (regardless of religious beliefs and political
leanings) needs to engage in mature debate about the
implications of an era in which science can sustain and transform our
natural bodies beyond the form that we now recognise as 'human'. If the
Terri Schiavo case succeeds in stimulating action on that front, the
tragedy she and her family suffered for 15 long years will not have
been in vain.
Thursday, 03 March 2005
Viruses: These things that invade our bodies
For the past fortnight I have been knocked out by chickenpox. Our two
youngest daughters brought the virus home from school about five weeks
ago. I had no idea adults could catch what is widely regarded as a
kindergarten illness until a visit to my doctor confirmed that my
increasingly severe chills and headaches (along with a couple of ugly
tell-tale rashes on my chest) were the first signs of an attack.
The leaflet handed to me informed "Symptoms are usually more severe in
adults than in children" and warned, "You can expect to have a few
uncomfortable days." This turned out to be an understatement. At times
I felt I was at death's door; a sentiment clearly shared by my
anxiously watching family as I progressively disappeared under a
blanket of huge spots, lost all appetite and suffered sleepless nights
and listless days. My poor angels had several bitter fights over just
who "gave daddy chickenpox".
Chickenpox is caused by the
varicella-zoster virus, a member of the
herpes family. Our immune system responds during an attack by producing
antibodies that should provide lifelong immunity thereafter, although
the condition can re-emerge as shingles in later life. For this reason,
doctors will not prescribe antiviral treatment unless there is an
ancillary life-threatening condition in exceptionally vulnerable
patients. My advice to anyone unlucky enough not to have had a mild
attack
in childhood (10% of the adult population) is to avoid infected people
like the plague. If you live in the USA you can
get a vaccination --
a pre-emptive strike not favoured by authorities on this side of the
Atlantic.
Confinement to bed has given me plenty of time to watch the news on TV.
My
misery was compounded by repeated warnings that we could be hit
anytime now by a
pandemic of bird flu (avian influenza).
World Health Organisation officials are worried that this so far
incurable
affliction that has already spread through
human-human contact may soon
combine with a human flu virus to create a new strain that will sweep
continents. The result will be a catastrophe of biblical proportions.
What exactly are
biological viruses? A virus is made up of a DNA or
RNA genome surrounded by a protein coat. It is far from anything that
we would consider a living cell or microorganism. A virus particle can
only reproduce by invading and taking over the cells of 'host'
organisms since it completely lacks the cellular machinery for
self-reproduction or independent metabolism. Thus, the argument runs
that viruses are not 'living' things. But because they are complex
assemblies of molecules that exhibit genetic inheritance, some
scientists view viruses as a kind of artificial life that fall
somewhere between living and non-living things. Viruses make excellent
Trojan horses for the introduction of DNA into cells by geneticists
researching gene therapies for human diseases. However there
is a high risk of viral infection (deaths have occurred in some trials)
so work in this area is tentative and cautious.
Where do viruses come from? This is still a mystery to science. The
most widely held belief is that viruses actually originated from their
preferred host organisms at some point in the distant past. Suspect
sources are plasmids (circular double stranded DNA molecules
that are
separate from chromosomal DNA) and transposons (sequences of DNA
that
can move around to different positions within the genome of a cell,
sometimes causing mutations). But why should genetic particles that
originated from an organism cause such havoc (indeed death in most
cases) when they re-enter the organism? It has also been suggested that
viruses could be extremely reduced microbes, that they may have
appeared separately in the primordial soup that gave rise to the first
living cells, and that the different sorts of known viruses probably
arose through different mechanisms.
Viruses are a frightening conundrum for humans. A non-living particle
invades a living organism without warning or invitation, springs to
life, reproduces in vast numbers, and then either lies dormant or exits
to its previous inanimate state in the environment. While in
the organism it may mutate by re-arranging its genetic coding but we do
not know what the signal might be for such mutation. From time to time
it also jumps host (e.g. from bird to human). All this makes it
extremely difficult to eradicate or counter viruses. Only vaccinations
(deliberate infusion of a mild form of the virus to stimulate
production of antibodies by our immune system) offer any sort of
protection. Coming up with a vaccine that works, can be safely
introduced into the life chain and is relatively easy to mass-produce
is a tedious, expensive and laborious process that usually requires
many years of research.
Meanwhile we all live under the shadow of unpredictable natural
pandemics, the threat of new lab-produced viruses for biological
warfare and deliberate dissemination by terrorists.
C'est la vie.